Sunday 25 September 2016

Conception among ASP.NET haters

asp.net software companies

While asp.net software companies are growing day-by-day, rare platforms appeal the same amount of rage as ASP.NET (or .NET in general) appeals from the development community. While there are surely valid criticisms of the platform, the majority of negativity derives from those who haven’t spent any time with .NET. Those developers stereotypically rely on misunderstandings or speak out disgust to base their opinion, and they do a damage to others looking to learn a novel technology and to the platform itself.

Here are the most common misconceptions  ASP.NET haters carry among with their selves.

Misconception: It’s Made by Microsoft, hence it’s only for profits

This is probably the #1 reason for all ASP.NET hate. Microsoft is a gigantic software corporation, and similar to all other corporations, they’re in business to generate cash. This is fascinating because the other key technology companies, such as Google and Apple, are there to make money, but the admirers of those other companies stereotypically turn a blind eye (or are in denial). Normal people don't really care who creates a product as long as that product serves the purpose. The developers (and nerds) treat technology, and/or the company that creates it, as a belief. In order for somebody to actually dislike something, that person has to attempt it.

Misconception: It's Expensive

What is costly for private use can be measured cheap in a business atmosphere. In business, there are numerous factors that make up the “price” of a product. The primary expense noticeably needs to be considered, but the benefit of the product is also factored into the whole total.

Misconception: It's Horrible for Small, Personal Websites

It’s really easy to get into the mentality that ASP.NET isn't appropriate for anything but large-scale establishments. Microsoft is a platform company, ultimately, and their products are largely dedicated towards business solutions. .NET isn’t really different in that context; it's massive in business environments, and its grip continues to mature as Microsoft magnifies novel and rejuvenated products like Azure (Microsoft’s Cloud platform) and Windows Phone, respectively.

Having a small business, one can always use the Web Pages, to develop it. But as business nurtures so does ASP.NET. ASP.NET lets one use MVC framework model. In which one can develop a web application, and ASP.NET allows developer to totally change the way the application is organized and used. One can edit Models, Controllers and Views to modify the content of the application, one can set ones’ own variables and so on.

Simplicity

Initially, Microsoft wants development on their platform, and they’ve acknowledged that it requires some (perhaps a lot of) simplification in order to produce. After all, PHP is as widespread as it is precisely because of its simplicity.

Misconception: It’s closed

Microsoft is a corporation that sells software, and they are certainly very defensive of their products’ source code. So, one might consider that ASP.NET (and .NET in general) is closed source, but that is not the situation. Microsoft brands the source code for the .NET Framework accessible for free, and one can step into the code while debugging ones’ individual apps. One can even construct ones’ private version of the .NET Framework. Microsoft also provides access to the source code of ASP.NET releases, giving the capability to test innovative features and provide opinion to the ASP.NET team.

Misconception: It's Not in Demand

Finally, it's often embraced that ASP.NET is not in demand, and that humbly is not true. Demand is somewhat subjective because different zones of the world and in the nation one has different job marketplaces. For all intentions and purposes, .NET has been the growth platform for Microsoft Windows environments (both for the desktop and the web) over the past few years.

ASP.NET comes up with one major feature that attracts clients to go for/ pay for the Microsoft functionality.

Security Features

ASP.NET is more secure than PHP. A novice will always make blunders in the code and will build an unsecure application. But, ASP.NET has few methods of its own that make is superior and secure. SQL Injection can be prohibited using the SQL Parameters that permit minimized injection.  ASP.NET has a security namespace that expresses all the methods that a company can use to safeguard its system.

Conclusion

The haters and cynics are probably having misconception, and ASP.NET is a technology that one should attempt and get to know. In the end, successful asp dot net software companies in India are adapters—able to write applications in several languages for different platforms.